7 Private Equity Diversification Mistakes Accredited Investors Keep Making (And How to Fix Them)
- Technical Support
.png/v1/fill/w_320,h_320/file.jpg)
- Jan 20
- 5 min read
Look, I get it. You've worked hard to reach accredited investor status, and private equity seems like the logical next step to level up your portfolio. The returns can be impressive, the access feels exclusive, and everyone at the country club is talking about their latest PE deal.
But here's the thing: I've watched countless sophisticated investors stumble into the same diversification traps over and over again. These aren't rookie mistakes: they're subtle errors that even experienced investors make because private equity plays by different rules than public markets.
Let's break down the seven most common mistakes and, more importantly, how to fix them.
Mistake #1: Confusing Quantity with Quality
This one's a classic. You've got investments in six different PE funds, so you must be diversified, right?
Not necessarily.
Having more holdings doesn't automatically mean lower risk: especially if those holdings are highly correlated. I've seen portfolios with a dozen PE investments that are essentially all betting on the same macro trend. Tech-focused growth equity here, SaaS-heavy buyout fund there, another fund that's "sector agnostic" but somehow ended up 70% in software companies.
When the market shifts, these positions move in lockstep. Your "diversified" PE allocation becomes one giant concentrated bet.
The fix: Map out your actual exposure across industries, geographies, deal stages, and fund strategies. Look at the underlying portfolio companies, not just the fund names. True diversification means building a PE portfolio where different pieces perform differently under various market conditions.

Mistake #2: Overrelying on Sector-Based Diversification
This mistake is related to the first, but it's sneaky enough to deserve its own spotlight.
Many investors think they're diversified because they have PE exposure in healthcare, technology, and consumer sectors. On paper, that looks balanced. In reality, the overlap can be massive.
Here's what I mean: A healthcare-focused fund might hold medical device companies that rely heavily on consumer spending trends. A "consumer" fund might invest in e-commerce businesses with significant technology infrastructure. A tech fund might have healthcare IT plays.
These sectors don't exist in isolation. The lines blur constantly, and your carefully constructed sector allocation might be more concentrated than it appears.
The fix: Go deeper than sector labels. Analyze the actual business models, revenue drivers, and economic sensitivities of underlying companies. Consider factors like customer concentration, geographic exposure, and sensitivity to interest rates. Sometimes a manufacturing company and a software company have more in common than two software companies.
Mistake #3: Ignoring Volatility in Allocation Decisions
Private equity has a reputation for smooth returns. And sure, the quarterly valuations don't whip around like public stocks. But that smoothness is partly an illusion: a byproduct of how PE investments are valued rather than their actual risk profile.
The problem comes when investors combine multiple high-volatility strategies without considering how they interact. Maybe you've got a growth equity fund, a venture capital allocation, and an opportunistic real estate fund. Each one carries significant risk individually, and together they can make your portfolio extremely difficult to manage: both financially and emotionally.
The fix: Look at the complete picture. Examine metrics like standard deviation, maximum drawdown, and correlation together. Consider how your PE allocation interacts with your public market holdings. Balance higher-volatility PE strategies with more stable cash-flowing investments like infrastructure or core real estate funds.

Mistake #4: Treating Diversification as Static
Here's something that caught a lot of investors off guard in 2022: correlations change.
During stable periods, different asset classes might move independently. Stocks zig while bonds zag. PE provides that uncorrelated return stream everyone talks about. Then a crisis hits, and suddenly everything moves together.
During the 2022 rate-hike cycle, both stocks and bonds declined simultaneously: completely reversing their usual inverse relationship. The same thing can happen within PE. Strategies that seemed uncorrelated during boom times can suddenly become highly correlated when credit markets tighten or economic growth stalls.
The fix: Rebalance and reassess regularly. Don't assume the relationships that held during your initial investment will persist forever. Stress-test your portfolio against different scenarios: rising rates, recession, credit crisis, inflation spikes. Understand how your PE investments might behave when markets get weird.
Mistake #5: Skipping Proper Due Diligence
I know this sounds obvious. Of course you do due diligence. You read the PPM, reviewed the track record, maybe even met the partners.
But here's what I see constantly: investors who spend months researching a public stock position but rush through PE commitments because the fund is "closing soon" or because a trusted friend recommended it.
Private equity demands more scrutiny, not less. These are illiquid, long-term commitments. You can't sell if something feels off six months later.
The fix: Build a systematic due diligence process and stick to it regardless of time pressure. Evaluate the GP's actual track record (not just IRR: look at multiples, loss ratios, and portfolio company outcomes). Understand the fee structure completely. Reference check with other LPs. If a fund won't give you time for proper diligence, that's a red flag, not a reason to rush.

Mistake #6: Underestimating Illiquidity Risks
PE investments are illiquid. Everyone knows this going in. But knowing something intellectually and experiencing it are different things.
I've watched investors commit 40% or more of their liquid net worth to PE, assuming they won't need the money for 10 years. Then life happens: a business opportunity, a health issue, a divorce, whatever: and suddenly that locked-up capital becomes a real problem.
There's also the practical headache of K-1 tax forms that arrive late and complicate your tax reporting. It sounds minor until you're filing extensions year after year because your PE investments can't get their paperwork together.
The fix: Be honest about your liquidity needs. Build in a buffer for the unexpected. A common guideline is to keep PE allocations below 20-25% of your investable assets, though the right number depends on your situation. And when planning your tax timeline, assume those K-1s will be late.
Mistake #7: Assuming PE Automatically Diversifies Your Equity Risk
Here's the uncomfortable truth that challenges a lot of conventional wisdom: private equity may not diversify your equity risk as much as you think.
PE investments are fundamentally equity positions in private companies. They have exposure to the same economic factors that drive public equity markets: GDP growth, consumer spending, corporate earnings. The "diversification benefit" often comes from the smoothing of returns rather than genuinely uncorrelated performance.
During market stress, private assets frequently have exposure to credit risk that doesn't truly offset equity risk. And because PE returns are reported with significant lag and smoothing, you might not realize how correlated your returns actually are until it's too late.
The fix: Don't count on PE to hedge your equity exposure. View it as an extension of your equity allocation with different characteristics (illiquidity premium, operational value-add, access to different company types) rather than a completely separate asset class. If you want genuine diversification, consider adding truly uncorrelated strategies: including alternative approaches like institutional-grade digital assets or hedged strategies.
Building a Smarter PE Portfolio
Avoiding these seven mistakes won't guarantee success, but it will put you ahead of most accredited investors who stumble into PE without a clear framework.
The key themes? Think beyond labels. Embrace complexity. Plan for the worst. And never stop reassessing.
Private equity can absolutely be a valuable part of a sophisticated portfolio. The returns, access to growing private companies, and potential for manager alpha are all real. But capturing those benefits requires intentional diversification: not just collecting different fund names and hoping for the best.
At Mogul Strategies, we help accredited and institutional investors build portfolios that blend traditional assets with innovative strategies. Whether you're looking to optimize your PE allocation or explore how digital assets might fit alongside your private investments, we're here to help you think through the options.
Because smart diversification isn't about avoiding risk entirely. It's about taking the right risks: intentionally and with eyes wide open.
Comments